Minneapolis PD gives statement in support of Somali illegal aliens against federal law enforcement
Bullshitters call it “protecting the community.”
The latest spectacle out of Minneapolis reveals something deeper than political posturing — it exposes a growing fracture in American governance. When local law-enforcement leaders step in front of cameras to declare they will not cooperate with federal immigration authorities, the message is unmistakable: ideology now outranks obligation.
Bullshitters call it “protecting the community.” Critics call it what it is — a city leadership class choosing symbolism over sovereignty.
The moment a police department effectively signals sympathy for residents in open violation of federal law, a line has been crossed. Police exist to uphold order, not reinterpret statutes to fit local politics. Yet Minneapolis officials behave as though immigration law is optional, a suggestion rather than a mandate.
This is defiance. A failure to uphold the rule of law.
Federal agents enforcing court-issued removal orders are treated as antagonists, while those who broke immigration law are cast as victims of federal overreach. The narrative has been flipped entirely upside-down. Minneapolis leadership is not defending the rule of law — they are strategically eroding it.
The consequences of these decisions do not fall on city hall conference rooms. They fall on the working-class neighborhoods that must absorb the real-world effects of a legal system that is no longer enforced consistently. They fall on federal officers who now must carry out lawful duties in cities that openly undermine them. They fall on a nation that cannot afford a patchwork interpretation of sovereignty.
Immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility — but respect for the law is everyone’s responsibility. When a city police department signals it will prioritize political optics over lawful cooperation, the country drifts one step closer to a system where ideology replaces statute and feelings replace order.
A nation cannot survive that way.
America deserves leaders who treat the law as the backbone of national stability, not an accessory to be rearranged depending on the crowd in the room. Minneapolis may believe it is making a principled stand — but the principle it’s actually promoting is selective obedience.
And there is nothing noble about that.
The people who ordered this need to be arrested, charged, and put in prison for a very long time. The message needs to be clear. You uphold your oath, enforce the law, cooperate with your law enforcement partners or you suffer very dire consequences for the actions you chose.
I find it despicable that any local law enforcement anywhere would declare their intention to protect local citizens from federal law enforcement. If the feds are acting within the Constitution and the law, the local law enforcement then make themselves culpable for any damage those they protected from the feds do.
Specifically in Minneapolis, the locus of the Somali invasion, the police should be looking to protect their citizens from the criminal element in their own society. If that criminal element's crime is entering the country illegally or they've committed some other federal crime, the local police should be happy to get these criminals off the street.
Posing as the protectors of a the law-breakers in the community makes the police conspirators with the criminals.
This is not a political party issue, it is an issue of obeying the oath you take when you enter law enforcement, not matter who you voted for.
If there's a provable crime committed by the police, indict, arrest, and try them as well. That's sort of the intent of the equal protection clause...